Mexico – The New China

Mexico – The New China

  • Mexico – The New China
    By: Admin

    Made In China Vs. Made In MexicoForget everything you knew about Mexico vs. China 10 years ago. Significant changes in economics, infrastructure, geo-politics and cost have made Mexico the new China from a manufacturing and distribution stand point. See how much change there has been in the following presentation. These changes in cost will compel you to: …Read More

    This entry was posted in Global Initiatives, Manufacturing and Distribution, Mexico, Supply Chain Optimization, on October 14, 2014
  • Cost effective Manufacturing: Mexico vs. China
    By: Admin
    Made In China Vs. Made In MexicoRecently, we have completed some work for a client on the “total cost of ownership differences” in 89 countries. Our results indicated that Mexico is more cost effective than China is in many industries. Surprising results? Learn more in this TECMA podcast on Mexico vs. China manufacturing with Jim Gitney, the CEO of Group50. If you prefer reading a transcript of the interview, you can …Read More
    This entry was posted in Global Initiatives, Manufacturing and Distribution, Mexico, Podcasts, Supply Chain Optimization, Total Cost of Ownership, on April 18, 2014
  • Total Cost of Ownership For Manufacturing and Distribution
    By: Admin
    canstockphoto6271482The Tecma Group of companies recently recorded a podcast with the Los Angeles-based president and CEO of Group 50 consulting, Jim Gitney, regarding current global manufacturing trends, such as Total Cost of Ownership, the growing interest in the concepts of “total cost of ownership” and “nearshoring.” During the approximately thirty minute session, Gitney, explains how …Read More
    This entry was posted in Continuous Improvement, Global Initiatives, Manufacturing and Distribution, Supply Chain Optimization, Total Cost of Ownership, on April 4, 2014
  • When Is The Best Time To Do Make vs. Buy?
    By: Admin

    Make vs. BuyI was recently speaking with a client about Make vs. Buy. We were discussing when the appropriate time was for doing that kind of analysis. The natural assumption is that world class organizations are doing that kind of analysis whenever a new product program or a major new contract is being worked on. It should be part of every analysis to provide continuous feedback to the Manufacturing organization and the business’s executives. Make vs. Buy analysis will tell you …Read More

    This entry was posted in Continuous Improvement, Global Initiatives, Manufacturing and Distribution, Mexico, Supply Chain Optimization, Total Cost of Ownership, on April 19, 2013
  • Case Study On Protecting A Company’s Intellectual Property

    protecting-intellectual-propertyYou are the CEO of a small company that has a retail product with patent rights. A very large department store chain sends one of your company’s products to China and begins buying a knock off from a Chinese manufacturer. When confronted by the company, the buyer tells you: “Your problem is with the Chinese manufacturer, not me, sue them”. How do you protect your rights, against customers or manufacturers who have very deep pockets, without losing all of their business and spending a huge sum of money? …Read More

    This entry was posted in Case Studies, Manufacturing and Distribution, Market Effectiveness, Strategy 5.0, Supply Chain Optimization, on November 2, 2011
  • Intellectual Property Audit

    Group50 Consulting, formed in 2004 announced today that it has added an Intellectual Property audit to its Company Physical®, a series of cross functional audits that companies should use to complement their financial audits as further validation of the company’s health.  This audit is focused on the business wide practices for protecting Intellectual Property.

    Most senior executives believe that Intellectual Property protection is a function of patents and trademarks. This is farthest from the truth according to Jim Gitney, Group50’s CEO. “Patents and trademarks are only a part of protecting a company’s IP. Your Intellectual Property is only as good as your willingness to protect it, and after the fact is a very costly proposition. A proactive approach to protecting IP includes the way outsiders are handled, how employees are trained and communicated with and the approach a business takes in its documentation. The more serious a company is about protecting its IP up front, the harder outsiders will think about stealing it. Unfortunately, we live in a world where a cost analysis often dictates whether or not another company will copy the hard work done by others. This topic is often not thought about or given enough credance as highlighted in a recent Group50 Case Study on Protecting a Company’s Intellectual Property Rights. “

    Group50 has designed this Intellectual Property audit to be able to quickly check how proactive a company is in its protection efforts. The audit provides a detailed report on how a company can be proactive and continue to protect it competitive position.  

    To find out more, call Jim Gitney, Group50’s CEO at +1 (626) 644-9746, email him at jgitney@group50.com or request more information here.

    About Group50®Group50 was founded in 2004 with the vision of providing clients with seasoned professionals who have spent their careers in business. The company has developed unique consulting products such as the Company Physical® and various workshops that are focused on helping companies effectively understand their strategic and operating gaps, create roadmaps to fix them and work side by side with them to implement those changes. Group50 provides clients with consultants who have the specific knowledge they require for a project. More information about the company can be found at www.Group50.com or by calling +1 (626) 644-9746.

    This entry was posted in Company Physical, Manufacturing and Distribution, Market Effectiveness, Supply Chain Optimization, on November 21, 2000

Subscribe To Group50 Blog

Call us: +1 (626) 644-9746
Quick Contact
error

Please share if you liked this article